Andrew Holness’ Mansion: A Study In Wealth-Shaming
When did it become a thing of shame to be wealthy in Jamaica?
It is quite possible that in the government’s austerity campaign I missed this new phenomenon, but clearly such a thing exists. Wealth shaming must be the new order of the day.
Why else would there be “concerns” and “observations”surrounding the house being constructed in Beverly Hills by Leader of the Opposition Andrew Holness?
I admit myself genuinely puzzled that Mr. Holness is being made to give account for the grandeur of his family home. Those who lead this farcical crusade of accountability argue that in a democracy, the private expenditure of a former Prime Minister and sitting Opposition Leader is fair game. I’m not at all convinced by this; chiefly because I believe the argument is a smokescreen designed to achieve sinister political motives.
Make no mistake, by raising this issue, Holness detractors are hoping to cement in the minds of the majority of the Jamaican people the idea that he is not one of them. His wealth creates a distinct “otherness” which makes him somehow unfit for the Office of Prime Minister.
The very suggestion should be offensive to all Jamaicans striving towards success and wealth. It is the lowest point in the long running saga of Jamaica’s divisive politics of class and poverty. It is necessary to confront and dispel the idea which suggests to the electorate that growing up or living in poverty is a prerequisite for political representation. Political narratives centered around this kind of thinking are ultimately more destructive than they are helpful to our political culture. How will we hope to attract successful Jamaicans to the political process if we continue to make wealth a thing of guilt and shame?
In the grand scheme of real estate development, is the cost (some $200,000,000) really that expensive? When one considers the location, the current land prices in Jamaica and the other incidents of home construction/renovation, have Mr. and Mrs. Holness really offended any principled position? I take no position on the attendant costs of constructing a house in that area, and whether they legitimately amount to $200,000,000, but I believe it may be helpful to the discussion, since we are intent on having the discussion, if some context were brought to it all. Otherwise, we leave it wide open to the snide asides and the petty political posturing we are currently witnessing.
To be sure, I can appreciate a constructive conversation around campaign finance reform and parliamentarians making financial declarations of wealth and assets. That certainly is desirable in a robust process to ensure transparency and accountability. But the ongoing fascination with Holness’ house is not that conversation, it is but another attempt to undermine Andrew Holness as a credible candidate for the Office of Prime Minister. Those of us who believe in celebrating rather than shaming individual success must reject this, and challenge those who would seek to establish this new order in our political narrative.
It’s true that public officials are inevitably subject to scrutiny, I do not dispute that. However, we must satisfy ourselves that in subjecting our elected representatives to the probing lens of accountability, we are reasonable. We must also ensure that we are sensitive to issues related to private family life; at the very least that should be off limits as far as is practical. What exactly is the message we send to the young Holness boys about their parents success when we subject it to such searching and sinister review? I can only imagine a child would conclude that there is something negative about acquiring and displaying wealth in Jamaica.
That shouldn’t ever be a message we want to send.
Contributed by Ricardo Brooks
If you like this article please consider joining our Forum HERE to help us grow.
Remember to share this article on Facebook and other Social Media Platforms. To submit your own articles or to advertise with us please send us an EMAIL at: [email protected]. Subscribe to our mailing list to get new articles sent to you automatically.
The question I have asked about this issue which no one have been able to answer is that his finances should be in the public record somewhere since as an MP he must disclose his assets to a committee (the name of which I can’t recall right now). I find it curious that not even the local media have tried to answer that question. Information from the public record should be enough to answer any questions about the source of funds for his house.
why is this post anonymous?? did Andrew Holness write this?
I would hate to think that anyone’s choice of residential construction/acquisition consistent with his taste and affordability can be a legitimate topic for discussino in the public domain. Unless, of course, there is just cause to conclude that it gives evidence of shady dealings.
Time was when Jamaicans who offered themselves for political office could reasonably be considered persons of (financial) substance. Such may be seen from the slate of candidates who contested the parliamentary elections of 1955. Their motive then seem more to have been nation building and self actualization.
In recent times, however aspirants seem to be coloured more by their quest for “upward mobility”. And quite a few among the electorate share the view that this has fueled the flame of corruption in high places. Given the sensitivity of his position during a discussion on this very topic one commemtator was recently heard to remark: “Mi tink Missa Holness did ‘ave more sense dan dat.”
Well,the majority of jamaicans dont struggle towards wealth, they struggle to feed, house and get theire kids to school. To question people in positions, people in power, people who are suppose to work for the people, to question these peoples wealth is not common in jamaica, and its a good thing if that could change. What do you mean by” wealth a thing of guilt and shame”? Its the opposite in Jamaica, wealth is never questioned, you can be totally corrupt, a drug seller or smuggler, you name it, and nobody cares where the money comes from, your riches is admired and the wealthy person a big man who everyone respect! And who are the successful Jamaicans you want to get into politics? the successful people who will run away from politics if the system question theire palace on the hill? What Jamaica need, is to change the love for palaces, fancy cars and all the bling bling. A total change of moral and ethics, yes, please start ask where the money comes from!
This article is so biased. Who cares if he is rich or poor. The question of the day is where him get di money from….simple….is it government,drugs etc.
…i will weigh in on this…….the ” problem ” with fort holness is not that he has built it….for a start off its not worth anywhere near the 250 million often quoted…its closer to 60/70 million but that aside it is being seen that he is making political claims about poverty being a crime and being seen ” comforting ” the ” poor “…..or slumming it as i think of it…….for him to claim that poverty is a crime suggests that poor people must be criminals.!…..poverty is NOT a crime mr holness.its a state of a living level…you are either above the poverty line or below it….64 % of jamaicans are below it….in simple terms you are rubbing their noses in it old chap……….also this is not a new argument regarding politicians and ” biggness “…i believe that ALL politicians should be audited on a regular basis for transparency….they are public servants….i employ them.!as a taxpayer…..i want to know that my tax money is going where it should go…x
Need to know his job title prior to entering politics, and if he’s so successful in business he should be proud to share it let jamaican know the road he took to wealth. I smell money laundering, favors for potential players because he’s a sure win for next election…
Whoever wrote this is trying to further the culture of our rich politicians leeching our country dry while we hush up just tru we either say powa or showa. One of the rich making sure that the rich stay in power.
I came across Warren’s Blog a supporter of the JLP and Mr. Holness who when he had discovered the existence of the Ghetto Mansion in question and not knowing the true owner, wrote a blog post stating: …. “There has been talk going around about a house which is being built for which the estimated cost is in the region of $300m. (“This was accompanied by a Clovis cartoon declaring who fa mansion dis…”, he continued)
Tongues have been wagging since the information was “dropped” sometime last week. What is interesting is the media who obviously have more information that I do , have refused thus far to call the name of leader, leading to wide spread speculation that it belongs to the leader of the ruling PNP administration the Rt Honuorable poor people champion.
If the information that I have gleaned so far is in fact true, it would confirm the widely held belief we have as it relates to the country leaders. It also begs the question as to why the assets of our elected leaders are not made public, why are we as a people refusing to hold our elected leaders accountable.”…….
Now he was ready to launch a full scale investigation and accused the media of being bias after speculating that the Ghetto mansion belonged to and I quote: “the leader of the ruling PNP administration the Rt Honuorable poor people champion” but when it was pointed out that the $300 Million Ghetto Mansion in question belonged to his Maximum Leader the Hon. Andrew Michael Holness and not the Maximum Leader for the opposing party he went suspiciously silent. It is this partisan double standard that I find disgusting… And now because an election is coming the JLP supporters are struggling to put the Ghetto Mansion into context that is palitable to the voters and anyone who question it is declared to be “Bad Mind”… If this house belonged to current Government leader, there would be no talk of wealth shaming, as if one can shame wealth… hahahahaha … It would be part and parcel of an election campaign…
Let’s be honest, Andrew is in the spotlight now because he chose to make such a big investment on Jamaican soil. Many other politicians have mutlistorey houses, beach houses n all overseas and they’re not being questioned about it. Maybe if he spend that money overseas like all the others then all this wouldn’t have come up. It’s sad to know that if someone makes big investments in their country they’re instantly scrutinized and have people breathing down their backs and, in Mr. Holness’ position, have that investment, a family home, used as part of a political mindgame. If real transparency is going to be achieved then it has to included all politicians from the prime minister down to the local MP. Bashing Mr. Holness while there are politicians in parliament who own assets worth much more in other countries is unfair.
LOL… the question is this: where did he get the money… to start this mansion the year he became de facto PM of the nation? nobody ever criticizes the wealthy business man for his possessions (as far as i see). The writer seems ignorant (willfully or otherwise) of the culture of corruption in Jamaica and the rampant abuse of authority which our politicians are regularly accused of. The fact is, this man, in a position of power, with access to our tax moneys, should be scrutinized, If not, then politicians will rob us blind, and depending on which politician it is, you’ll have their tribal supporters, writing articles claiming that they are under ‘political’ attack. I wonder, whether the purpose of highlighting the crime, makes it any less of a crime… Whether the accusation or trial is political in nature, will not the guilty be guilty and the innocent, declared thus? (depending on the evidence, of course). This extra defense that politicians have over the normal citizen, is no defense at all.
Why are we acting like this is something new. All our politicians live lavishly, look at the one Phillip Paulwell built during the years of his youthfull exuberance.
If the average joe build a home half that size he would be a suspect.
All politician should turn over their finances . Trump have to file his and he’s just running he’s not yet elected
This article is of the highest order when it come to either intellectual dishonesty or sheer unbridled naivety. A MP’s salary is public record, also his wealth once he is in the public domain/office must be declared from the onset for transparancy and good governance. With that being said the non-disclosure of his wealth and how it was acquired given his paltry annual salary as an MP and the fact that he has no other claim to the succes of which this article speaks is the root cause of why so many outside of the political arena question his flamboyance and possibly his arrogance and lack of prudeness to build this house with enuring that all his declarations are public. That is where he draws the ire of the “articulate minority” and rightly so in my opinion. No one in jamaica shames wealth, after all we all buy a quick print when the Lotto or Super Lotto jackpot is mouth watering as such there is nothing wrong to question the actions of an individual, who is in the public domain and seeking to represent in a public office, whose assests and source of “wealth” is not a matter of public record.
If 2 + x = 4 then clearly people will assume x=2 and not a 1/2
This article is of the highest order when it comes to either intellectual dishonesty or sheer unbridled naivety, although I really hope that it is down to ignorance of what creates and fosters good governance. Firstly, A MP’s salary is public record and can be found out quite easily. So therefore his wealth, once he is in the public domain/office, must be declared from the onset for transparency and good governance otherwise various questions will be raised irrespective of the underlying motives. With that being said the non-disclosure of his wealth and how it was acquired given his paltry annual salary as an MP when compared to other highly paid execs who run corporations in Jamaica and the Caribbean, must raise questions when the other side of the equation is clearly missing even though it shouldn’t be. The fact that he has no other claim to the “success” of which this article speaks is the root cause of why so many, including outside of the political arena, question his flamboyance and possibly his arrogance and lack of prudence to build this house without ensuring that all his declarations are public.
That, in my opinion, is where he draws the ire of the “articulate minority/inarticulate majority” and rightly so! No one in Jamaica shames wealth, after all, we all buy a quick print when the Lotto or Super Lotto jackpot is mouth watering. Nothing, therefore, is wrong to question the actions of an individual, who is in the public domain and seeking to represent in a public office, whose assets and source of “wealth” is not a matter of public record when for it should have been.
If 2 + x = 4 then clearly people will assume x=2 and not a 1/2
Of course its a shame to be “super” wealthy in a country that is near bankruptcy!!! The latest Moody report states that we are near that.
I think a “slap in the face” to poor and starving Jamaicans when people, especially public servants, display this level of spending.
Of course its a shame to be “super” wealthy in a country that is near bankruptcy!!! The latest Moody report states that we are near that.
I think a “slap in the face” to poor and starving Jamaicans when people, especially public servants, display this level of spending.
That is PNP propaganda at its best. They have that type of machinery at their disposal and they use it successfully on the minds of ‘numb-thinking’ voters to win many elections. Why do you think that will change?
Most time I have to laugh when I hear badminded people talk. Anyone can build any size house if you are working and have collectoral to get a bank loan or loans. I never heard anyone mention that he could be using loans. As a matter of fact, its none of us business where the man money came from or is coming from. Raise your hands who have missed any money and beleive that it has spent on Mr Holness house.