Are Women too emotional to be Good Leaders?
This gentleman left a comment on a recent post I made stating that women should not be leaders because they are too emotional.
I went to my Oxford to confirm the definition of “Emotional” and it states : (of a person) having feelings that are easily excited and openly displayed or arousing or characterized by intense feeling.
I assume he meant women should not be leaders because they lack the emotional fortitude that men possess. But men do express emotions. I think anger is an emotion. Maybe my definition or my idea of what expressions characterize an emotion might be somewhat skewed but the last time I checked men might not cry, write a poignant article or mope around but they will definitely get angry. In my estimation, men can be just as emotional as women only that they express their feelings differently.
I have never seen :The Honorable Portia Simpson Miller, President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia, President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner of Argentina or President Dilma Rousseff of Brazil cry for that matter. But I did see Minister Kern Spencer “sob” in Parliament during the Cuban light bulb Saga. Not only him but Former Prime Minister Edward Seaga is widely known to cry publicly and even so is still considered among the masses as a militant leader. Male leaders from time to time will shed a few tears and there is nothing wrong with that. Some men might squirm at the idea of a man crying but maybe if we encouraged our boys to cry more, we would not have so many angry disaffected youths walking around beating their chests like King Kong.
I do not see a male as less of man for being “emotional, if anything it reaffirms his humanity. I think women are very strong individuals and some have more ‘balls’ than a lot of men put together. Women can certainly do more with less money, take care of children without a partner and tolerate the excruciating pains associated with childbirth labour.
If crying is the only thing that disqualifies a woman from a leadership position then anger displayed by men should deem them unfit for leadership. People get killed everyday because most men cannot keep ” their emotions” in check. It is because of “masculine emotions” why our jails are teeming with males and wars are waged each year. On the path we are heading with women dominating men in our Universities and Managerial positions we might very soon have an all-female parliament. OOps!!!!
Any woman will admit that when a lover, brother or male relative is hurt, his emotional expression will range anywhere from mild annoyance to rage. Men do not cry but they will get upset and let out a slew of profanities. Crying is considered a weak emotion but anger is also a feeble expression that can lead to destructive behaviour such as violence. I do not think getting loud, angry and abusive is a demonstration of the level headed emotions necessary to run a country. Females are far more sensitive but are not so due to sex but socialization and hormones. Look at all the problems we are having in this world run by testosterone.
One writer muses that if the world had more female leaders we would have less wars and only a group of countries not having any form of dialogue. That might be the issue that most men have with the idea of female leaders that their “emotions” will affect their decision making process. It means that if a country is to go to war then a female leader would be hesitant for her maternal instincts might kick in and she would feel empathy for women and children in that country who might become casualties of a war. It is not that women are not inclined to be ruthless but men will claim that they are more capable of handling this part of leadership.
I do not think leaders turn off their emotions when they make certain decisions. Everyday leaders and citizens make choices concerning their lives based on their own individual rationale. Women who lead companies and countries have displayed that they are just as capable of making rationale decisions as men. One’s ability as a leader should not be based solely on gender but on effectiveness based on skills and demonstrated experience.
Men and Women cry, people react to situations differently and even hardened men in the face of hopelessness and exhaustion will become emotional. Emotions do not always influence bad judgement. Some people do attest to having clarity after a bout of emotional outburst.
I am female, I cry whenever I feel overwhelmed. It is my natural response, it is my expected reaction based on gender roles and social norms. Does it make me or any other female more or less likely to make erroneous decisions? Maybe and maybe not.
We have experimented with both male and female leaders so that should tell us something about gender bias when it comes to politics.
Please Share your views.
Like her writing? Get a free preview of her latest novel HERE
If you like this article please consider joining our Forum HERE to help us grow.
Remember to share this article on Facebook and other Social Media Platforms. To submit your own articles or to advertise with us please send us an EMAIL at: [email protected]. Subscribe to our mailing list to get new articles sent to you automatically.
On the whole I feel women make the better leaders. Women are more focused and know what is wanted and go for it at the best price, while men are not so on the ball. They will talk and think about it, but nothing will get done at anytime soon, and pre-election promises are nearly always broken. The exception here being Portia Simpson-Miller who squandered taxpayer’s money on luxuries while the country suffered. A huge mistake electing her. As far as emotions go, if you’re running a country, albeit male or female, these should be kept in check as a… Read more »
this onw seems bias!! I think when people say “women are too emotional to lead” it refers more the decision making. In my economics class the female always refer back to how the decision will make others feel or affect versus what good the decision will door the effect of not making it. The countries led by women are economically plagued Argentina, Liberia and Jamaica. Take Portia Miller when she speaks about the economy she speaks more about feelings look at a Audley Shaw when he speaks it more about longevity and sustainabiltiy. I think woman can fantastic leaders but… Read more »
this onw seems bias!! I think when people say “women are too emotional to lead” it refers more the decision making. In my economics class the female always refer back to how the decision will make others feel or affect versus what good the decision will door the effect of not making it. The countries led by women are economically plagued Argentina, Liberia and Jamaica. Take Portia Miller when she speaks about the economy she speaks more about feelings look at a Audley Shaw when he speaks it more about longevity and sustainabiltiy. I think woman can fantastic leaders but… Read more »
this onw seems bias!! I think when people say “women are too emotional to lead” it refers more the decision making. In my economics class the female always refer back to how the decision will make others feel or affect versus what good the decision will door the effect of not making it. The countries led by women are economically plagued Argentina, Liberia and Jamaica. Take Portia Miller when she speaks about the economy she speaks more about feelings look at a Audley Shaw when he speaks it more about longevity and sustainabiltiy. I think woman can fantastic leaders but… Read more »
I think the best leader for any country, is the one who listen to God and his direction.